Go Back   CMP Forums > Sales > M1 Carbine
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2010, 10:33 AM
MhoinNV MhoinNV is online now
Participant
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 388
Default Delivery Date

Is there data out there to show lag time from completion of carbine to applying acceptance mark on the stock by the gov't. ??? Time lag to delivery to combat units in the field ??? It is my understanding that a receiver mfg in Dec 1943 could have been mated to a barrel having a Mar 1944 barrel then would take additional time to be accepted by the gov't. and distributed to the troops in the field. I realize this could vary quite a bit but was looking for some rough numbers...

Thanks in advance ??? Mho
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2010, 11:53 AM
Carbineitis Carbineitis is offline
Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southeastern Michigan
Posts: 239
Default

"receiver mfg in Dec 1943 could have been mated to a barrel having a Mar 1944 barrel" (date) ? Is it possible? Yes.. But not the norm..Not even for the primary manufacturers that used the government free issue barrel program. IMHO
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2010, 12:37 PM
BQ97 BQ97 is offline
Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MhoinNV View Post
Is there data out there to show lag time from completion of carbine to applying acceptance mark on the stock by the gov't. ???
There is data that shows the time lag between carbine completion to the carbine being in government control.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2010, 10:10 AM
BQ97 BQ97 is offline
Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 574
Default

I didn’t remember the particulars so I had to go back and look at my notes. It should give some insight as to how long it took for a carbine to go from the application of a serial number to it becoming property of the government.

The WRA serial number 1035586 was stamped on a partially completed receiver on 2 March 1943. On 15 March 1943 the completed carbine was part of an Ordnance Dept Test at the Inland plant. In the twelve days between the stamping date and the beginning of the test date the receiver was completed, assembled into a complete carbine, proof fired, targeted, underwent acceptance testing, packed and shipped to Dayton, Oh. This serial number was the shortest time between serial number stamping and showing up as a completed carbine at a known date I could uncover. The longest duration I could document was 75 days. The average was 28 days.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2010, 10:17 AM
jeeperbob jeeperbob is offline
Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vail, AZ
Posts: 533
Default

Brian, would that support the theory that original bbl dates were generally the same month or within one month later/earlier of the receiver dates?
__________________
The Early Bird Gets the Worm but the Second Mouse Gets the Cheese!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2010, 10:22 AM
MhoinNV MhoinNV is online now
Participant
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 388
Default

To BQ97,
Thanks for the extra effort !! I can see that I am going to have to take notes on notes to get educated in this hobby I have taken up. I got a late start at 65 but better late than never !! Still waiting on CC for back issues which may take some time. The thought that weapons went out quickly like FedEx today(overnight) wouldn't have been possible and the logistics of transporting large quantities of all material during the war must have been monumentous !! Light snow today but nothing like the east !!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.